The history that appears before us in this movie there are the memoirs of the journalist Lynn Barber, and in her the awakening is told us to the adult life of a teenager, Jenny (Tortoiseshell Mulligan), who doubts between following his student's life, encouraged by his teacher Miss Stubbs (well interpreted by Olivia Williams), or, to live a little more enjoying pleasures, like dinners, holidays, auctions, we go social life as a whole, next to his "boyfriend" David (Peter Sarsgaard). The epoch that reports us the movie, very conservative, and with a few values much of this time pos war, they lead us to having certain friendliness as Jenny's personage, which wants to be able to decide than to do with his life. To emphasize of course how the best of the peli, the performance of Tortoiseshell Mulligan, very convincing in the role of the doubtful young woman, of which I travel to take, the luxurious life that his fiancé proposes to him treintañero (then you will realize of that all that glitters is not gold), or on the contrary to pay attention his parents, who are for the work of which he studies and a future is worked. To emphasize also the father's role that here desenvolupa in a magisterial way big Alfred Molina, and also although in minor order, the appearances of Emma Thompson, like rector of the school where Jenny studies studies. Although he would say that it is not a movie much of my style, and although he has not filled with enthusiasm me too much either, I will not be very hard with her, it has a very British style, and in general lines, it is a generous aprovado. We recommend it for persons addicted to the drama, which they like to use clinex visionando dramas. NOTA:5 '5 OF 10 TRAILER OF AN EDUCATION
Niels Arden Oplev that you are behind a camera, or Thomas Alfredson, idem also, might not you have been the managers of capturing the part 2 and 3, of the "adaptations" of the trilogy of Stieg Larsson, to the movies? porqué you leave to us in hands, of Daniel Alfredson, that the cagó by means of good in the second part, and although I admit it it redeems itself a little in the third one, it continues below the first guided part, for (to the step that these two parts go, big governing) Niels Arden Oplev, that if he knew, to continue enough good the novel, like his continuator, that although having two opportunities, for me he has not known how to put a text if complicated (thing that I admit) in more than two hours of length. This final chapter for the time being, (there are rumors of the fourth novel) presents us to Lisbeth (Noomi Rapace) on the verge of being judged for trying to kill his father, Zalachenko, who is badly injured in a hospital, just as she, and although everything points to that it will have a negative end for Salander, so much M. Blomkvist (Michael Nyqvist) his most faithful friend, like the sister of this Annika, like his ancient chief Dragan Armanskij, will try to clean his name and finish with the conspiracy that tries to finish with her. I believe that this part is better that the second one, and although there are moments in which he remembers the previous one, for saying one, the mania that the scriptwriter has, or the director in mixing things that in the novel are not that way, or that happen in other different moments in the temporary line of the same one, I believe that Alfredson has improved his previous performance. What do I find positive? for me, of half of movie forward, the action, what it spends on screen, is alike more what the book tells us, and the piece of the court in Lisbeth's judgment, it performs the best of the movie, obviously I love Noomi in the Salander role, for me, well helped by the personage of the Doctor Teleborian (Anders Ahlbom), the same Blomkvist, and in less measured by others, that of his sister Annika Giannini (Anika Halin) like Lisbeth's lawyer, or the friendly journalist of Michael, Erika Berger (Lena Endre), who, and that I already will say it in the negative paragraph, I have not just liked in any aspects of the personage. It is of drawer that it continues the plot line of Larsson's novel, and that apart from the judgment, there are diverse moments in which I felt much identified with what he had read, in the book, examples, of this they are, the time in which she is in the hospital, or the part of the godforsaken factory where Chapeau is hidden, the personage of his stepbrother, Niederman, in this aspect! Where is the mistake for me? in the first scenes, for example, the form since there escapes Niederman, of the final scene of the previous part, given at the beginning of this one, or since we see that they have joined the time in which Erika, should have gone to the newspaper that him offers to work like chief, or for example when it is chased by a person who him sends anonymous threatening, as they are solved, in the movie? making them quite together, without being like that in the novel for anything, other? they skip any participation of his first tutor (of Lisbeth), Holger Palmgrer (Per Oscarsson), without naming little leading role, which in two parts there has the inspector Bublanski (Johan Kylén), the investigation to which it is important in the novels, on the other hand here it is not for Alfredson. It might continue with details like the pregnancy of the actress who interprets Annika, which yes, you might call me touchy, but the fact is that it is not like that in the novel, new paragraph that if you have not read the novels, and are going to see the peli, then, you go more lost than a squid in a fishbowl. There are many personages who go out, of almost nominal form, or others that should be more important in the plot, they it are less. I believe, keep on thinking, that the rhythm of the movies is slow, for what they should be, that doing this way the productions, of a few literary so important works, in the shape of movies, they were deserved much more than the realized ones by the Swedishes offer. On having gone out of the movies, I thought that perhaps in format series they should be rather finished, or realized, since of course in a time we will have a mini series of 6 chapters, (channel + has the rights of three pelis, more the series) and perhaps there be seen in his real magnitude. More of Alfredson was hoping, a pity that they should not to put in hands of the talented brother (Thomas), fellow man worked (of course there would be better pelis), and I keep on thinking that the first one is the one that more is alike Larsson's novels. Globally it is better that the previous one, but, lower than the version that There Burn Oplev, which for me, if that entendío that means Larsson's work. The luck that they have is that given the boom, of the novels, they will have big benefits, be better or worse done. Do you doubt? do they appear before me on having thought how will the versions of these do in Hollywood, that actors will do them, (Natalie Portman = Lisbeth?) and if they will be (I doubt it) more faithful to the novels. If this was an Oscars delivery, and it would have to give them to the Millennium trilogy, more or less, Movie would go así:Mejor: Millennium 1Mejor the Director: They burn OplevMejor Actriz: without doubts Noomi RapaceMejor actor: this one would leave his desert, I have not just liked globally Michael NyqvistMejor script: Millennium 1Mejor B.S.O: Millennium 1peor peli of the three: Millennium 2. Better actor secuandario:Anders Ahlbom Better (Teleborian) secondary actress: Anika Halin (Annika Giannini).Nota Millennium 1: checked by me, 7.5 Notices Millennium 2: without checking 4Nota Millennium 3: 6NOTA ENTIRE TRILOGY MILLENNIUM: 5,75 (more than anything for the first one)
The Soloist talks each other of a movie of biographical category, interpreted of quite correct form for his two protagonists, Robert Downey Jr in the role of Steve Lopez, a reporter of the Los Angeles Steal, that one day discovers in full street, to a man without hearth, but with a big musical talent, and Nathaniel Ayers interpreted by Jamie Foxx, who has pictures of schizophrenia quite difficult to control, added to a big talent. To the being a peli based on a book, which simultaneously is based on real facts, is complicated sometimes having enough aptitude to understand the complex of the case that here desenvolupa., really this peli has left cold to me, obviously that the best thing there are the interpretations of two actors, and although the movie is very well made, I believe that it remains a little slack in some passages, and not really if what the director wants takes shape of the tape, or on the contrary something remains in the inkwell. Sometimes when a topic is of a certain interest for for example the Americans, but fond of a local ambience, as it is the case of this history, it spends that unless the peli has a very good invoice, there become you a bore, insipid in some moment. This is at least what it spent to me. If you are fans of Downey or of Foxx, perhaps you like seeing both in roles out of the habitual ambience, look at it, but do not be too demanding, it is not a movie for it. IT NOTICES: 5,5 of 10
Since you know this night there will be done delivery of the awards Oscars 2009, and now I will do to you a summary of the votings of those who have entered the blog to give his opinion, there we go. Better Original script, 70 % of the votes has been for Damned Bastards. I believe that she can be very well the winner, Up, jointly with In hostile ground, it has 10 % of your votes. Better Foreign Movie, in this category you have had two clear favorites, The Secret of his eyes (Argentina) with 50 % of the votes and The White Tape (Germany) with 40 %, which is the one that I believe that it will gain (although I would like more that Secondary Actress was gaining other one).Mejor, also you it realize quite well, with more votes, Mo'nique 45 % (I believe that the darling), and Penelope Cruz with 35 % that might be the second option. Better actor Secundario, the preferred one by majority according to you is Cristopher Waltz with 72 % of votes. Better Actor of 2009, for you the voters, is Jeff Bridges with 44 % of the votes, but, also you believe that Morgan Freeman, and George Clooney with each one 27 % has options, of winning. I believe that what it will spend is that it will gain Bridges, we will see. Better Actress of 2009, there is variety in this class, because the votes split into two directions, Sandra Bullock with 56 % of votes, and Meril Streep, with 37 %. The darling, that not winner for the time being, he is Sandra Bullock. For the Oscar to the best director according to your votes, there is a clear favorite, who is James Cameron, with 63 % followed by Quentin Tarantino with 22 % and in the third place, Kathryn Bigelow, with 13 % of votes, according to an intuition that I have, and contrary to what there are the votes, I believe that the director of In Hostile ground, has many numbers of gaining the statuette. Better Movie of 2009: Emphasized with 64 % of the votes Incarnation, it is for you (at first, even I) the favorite to win, followed by background, for, Damned Bastards, with 23 %, and then at a lot of distance with 4 % of the votes, three pelis, In Hostile Earth, Precious, and An Education, but I believe that the surprise can jump with In Hostile ground, that according to the critics it can be covered with the delivery of this night. Thanks for taking part, I will be hanging this night of the delivery and tomorrow I will put the results to you here. Greetings. 
Undoubtedly, the winner of the edition 82 of the Oscars of Hollywood has been The Hard Locker (In Hostile Earth), of Kathryn Bigelow, that between 6 awards that they have granted him, they are, the better director (in this case director) and better movie. Incarnation with 3 statuettes of 9 is the defeated one, without discussion, although he will always be able to say that it is the most popular peli of the history of cinema, with more than 2000 million taquillaje. Very positive surprise has been, the victory of The Secret of his eyes, production Argentina, very interesting, very hard, in some moments, but always, captivating. To notice that Up, it has taken 2 Oscars, for better Sound-track, and better animation movie, although in his first twenty minutes, it does not seem that it is of animation, sinó cash commodity. Other categories that there have not surprised better sound actor, actress, secondary actor, secondary actress, Bridges, Bullock, Waltz, and Mo'nique, were sung enough. PD: Pathetic end of the gala, seeing Tom Hanks, running to give the award to better peli, since it had been done to them late, and they had to urge. (of sorrow) 
Something similar spent to a servant to the title of the peli, for much that I continued looking at it fixedly and without losing detail, I did not see the grace for any side. Not if it will be for movie buff seniority or that, but whenever I see the casting of a production, and meet two, or more names of "small bells" I begin trembling. This peli seems that it was gestated in an Irish pub of Boston, with the actors and the director taking a few beers, and choosing the roles to more loutish which, and finishing all given birth had and for having in the script of the same one. Is not it understood that having actors of the level of George Clooney, Ewan McGregor, Jeff Bridges (winner of oscar to the best actor of the year, not for this one skylight), and to Kevin Spacey, finish the vision of similar nonsense, saying to itself, but that coño is this? the history is already of if somewhat hilarious, and it tells us the adventures of a unit of elite of the USA, that across the control of psychic skills, he wants to control the mind of his enemies and to force them to give up without the need to use the violence. The problem? that never you believe similar nonsense, the actors seem bulging of a movie of the brothers Coen, but without them skylight, here the surrealistic humor touches, he is not for anything like for example the personnel for the above-mentioned ones in The Big Leboswky (big peli), and I recognize it, I smiled in some moment, but they were less, most of the peli, I spent it to myself thinking, how it is possible to waste to an actors' cast like those who go out here, with similar script jumble, without ton they are not even, and that it has in the end his most surrealistic moment, with the liberation of the goats, to the revolution years 70 (if you dare to see it, already you will say to me). I suppose that in the USA it will have had his success ration, but, doubt that his humor, to the style absurd "Top Secret" to any more not be able, deep gypsy in Europe, for our good I hope that should not please too much, although seeing as the people lose his vital time seeing jumbles of the style of "Save me" or "DEC", I begin worrying. Another movie perhaps of the style "chorra" would be Trophic Thunder" although I believe that it still overcomes that one this one in a quality minimum (it does not win for much, but it wins), and really it is worrying to see the absence of ideas that exists nowadays in the world of the movies, it does not surprise me that the people as J.J.Abrams, are so requested, it is an example, with his Lost, or the version of Star Trek 11, of that is of better that there is for the time being. I went away for the hills of Ubeda, pardon, I believe really that to see this "thing" would be to waste your time, money, and better look for something more lucrative in what to use the "time" of your life. I hope for our good that there should not recur bullshit of this style, which stop in bad place to other premieres than if they are worth while, in the next criticism I put to you one, greetings. IT NOTICES: 3 of 10
Does the couple Damon and Greengrass, reach another level with Green Zone, leading to a second lieutenant of the army of the USA, Roy Miller (Damon's personage) to some norms skipping to he to quarrel porqué and his men are staking the life in Iraq looking for a few WMD (Weapon of mass destruction), or for Weapons of mass destruction (those who were saying Bush&Blair&Aznar that existed), which, after receiving orders to look for them in a few emplacements, are never found (it will not be that they do not exist?) and come as his work is never rewarded. The message of the peli, and although it is already a little slow, it is seeing as across the lie, of the political, economic, financial interests, it is possible to go so far as to construct a war, to cheat the people whom you represent (in this case to that of the USA), and as of cruel, the persons can become in danger situations. For me, in my humble opinion, it is a question of a good action peli, in a warlike plane, with a good dose of adrenaline, testosterone, and an intensive rhythm, thing for that I am grateful. A production is made in Greengrass (two qualifications of the trilogy of Bourne, there are examples of well made movies), the director who in his credit has styles of movies, very varied, action (Bourne, Green Zone) social movies (United 93) or recreating historical situations (Sunday Bloody Sunday). Negative things? the excess use of Greengrass of the camera to the shoulder, that it trembles that you do not see, and that a little bit ok, but, several times is tiring a little. Also I will say to you that it is not a fact that makes me lower the final note, because there are more positive things than denials. To stand out also the secondary actors, Brendan Gleeson, (Martin Brown) as agent of the CIA, which will recruit Miller for the mission to uncover the filth that exists, Gregg Kinnear (Clark Poundstone) the one that hides the filth that Miller must uncover, and Jason Isaacs (lieutenant colonel Briggs), the manager for Poundstone, so that Miller does not find any filth. To emphasize the personage who represents the soul of the Iraqi people, which believes in the democracy, in the values, in the justice, the cabdriver Freddy (Khalid Abdalla), who will help Miller to obtain his targets, and who will turn out to be an important piece in the final part of the movie. If you like the action (without being exaggerated), the message anti Bush (you lie more that you speak), and you are fans of the binomial Damon&Greengrass, up I cheer you to see it. You will not repent. IT NOTICES: 7 of 10