CRITICISM MILLENNIUM 3 La Reina in the palace of the air currents By Mixman

Niels Arden Oplev that you are behind a camera, or Thomas Alfredson, idem also, might not you have been the managers of capturing the part 2 and 3, of the "adaptations" of the trilogy of Stieg Larsson, to the movies? porqué you leave to us in hands, of Daniel Alfredson, that the cagó by means of good in the second part, and although I admit it it redeems itself a little in the third one, it continues below the first guided part, for (to the step that these two parts go, big governing) Niels Arden Oplev, that if he knew, to continue enough good the novel, like his continuator, that although having two opportunities, for me he has not known how to put a text if complicated (thing that I admit) in more than two hours of length. This final chapter for the time being, (there are rumors of the fourth novel) presents us to Lisbeth (Noomi Rapace) on the verge of being judged for trying to kill his father, Zalachenko, who is badly injured in a hospital, just as she, and although everything points to that it will have a negative end for Salander, so much M. Blomkvist (Michael Nyqvist) his most faithful friend, like the sister of this Annika, like his ancient chief Dragan Armanskij, will try to clean his name and finish with the conspiracy that tries to finish with her. I believe that this part is better that the second one, and although there are moments in which he remembers the previous one, for saying one, the mania that the scriptwriter has, or the director in mixing things that in the novel are not that way, or that happen in other different moments in the temporary line of the same one, I believe that Alfredson has improved his previous performance. What do I find positive? for me, of half of movie forward, the action, what it spends on screen, is alike more what the book tells us, and the piece of the court in Lisbeth's judgment, it performs the best of the movie, obviously I love Noomi in the Salander role, for me, well helped by the personage of the Doctor Teleborian (Anders Ahlbom), the same Blomkvist, and in less measured by others, that of his sister Annika Giannini (Anika Halin) like Lisbeth's lawyer, or the friendly journalist of Michael, Erika Berger (Lena Endre), who, and that I already will say it in the negative paragraph, I have not just liked in any aspects of the personage. It is of drawer that it continues the plot line of Larsson's novel, and that apart from the judgment, there are diverse moments in which I felt much identified with what he had read, in the book, examples, of this they are, the time in which she is in the hospital, or the part of the godforsaken factory where Chapeau is hidden, the personage of his stepbrother, Niederman, in this aspect! Where is the mistake for me? in the first scenes, for example, the form since there escapes Niederman, of the final scene of the previous part, given at the beginning of this one, or since we see that they have joined the time in which Erika, should have gone to the newspaper that him offers to work like chief, or for example when it is chased by a person who him sends anonymous threatening, as they are solved, in the movie? making them quite together, without being like that in the novel for anything, other? they skip any participation of his first tutor (of Lisbeth), Holger Palmgrer (Per Oscarsson), without naming little leading role, which in two parts there has the inspector Bublanski (Johan Kylén), the investigation to which it is important in the novels, on the other hand here it is not for Alfredson. It might continue with details like the pregnancy of the actress who interprets Annika, which yes, you might call me touchy, but the fact is that it is not like that in the novel, new paragraph that if you have not read the novels, and are going to see the peli, then, you go more lost than a squid in a fishbowl. There are many personages who go out, of almost nominal form, or others that should be more important in the plot, they it are less. I believe, keep on thinking, that the rhythm of the movies is slow, for what they should be, that doing this way the productions, of a few literary so important works, in the shape of movies, they were deserved much more than the realized ones by the Swedishes offer. On having gone out of the movies, I thought that perhaps in format series they should be rather finished, or realized, since of course in a time we will have a mini series of 6 chapters, (channel + has the rights of three pelis, more the series) and perhaps there be seen in his real magnitude. More of Alfredson was hoping, a pity that they should not to put in hands of the talented brother (Thomas), fellow man worked (of course there would be better pelis), and I keep on thinking that the first one is the one that more is alike Larsson's novels. Globally it is better that the previous one, but, lower than the version that There Burn Oplev, which for me, if that entendío that means Larsson's work. The luck that they have is that given the boom, of the novels, they will have big benefits, be better or worse done. Do you doubt? do they appear before me on having thought how will the versions of these do in Hollywood, that actors will do them, (Natalie Portman = Lisbeth?) and if they will be (I doubt it) more faithful to the novels. If this was an Oscars delivery, and it would have to give them to the Millennium trilogy, more or less, Movie would go así:Mejor: Millennium 1Mejor the Director: They burn OplevMejor Actriz: without doubts Noomi RapaceMejor actor: this one would leave his desert, I have not just liked globally Michael NyqvistMejor script: Millennium 1Mejor B.S.O: Millennium 1peor peli of the three: Millennium 2. Better actor secuandario:Anders Ahlbom Better (Teleborian) secondary actress: Anika Halin (Annika Giannini).Nota Millennium 1: checked by me, 7.5 Notices Millennium 2: without checking 4Nota Millennium 3: 6NOTA ENTIRE TRILOGY MILLENNIUM: 5,75 (more than anything for the first one) TRAILER OF MILLENNIUM 3